• Original research article
  • June 6, 2025
  • Open access

Designing foreign language learning activities using generative artificial intelligence tools: potential and limitations

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools for the purpose of educational content creation. The aim of the study is to assess the potential and identify the limitations of GenAI in designing English teaching materials. AI-generated content is evaluated based on the following criteria: linguistic-pedagogical accuracy, ease of creation, and need for subsequent revision. The scientific novelty of this study lies in assessing the effectiveness of using AI tools such as СhatGPT, Perplexity, GigaChat for generating diverse exercises for teaching English as a foreign language based on the analysis of authentic tasks from Oxford and Macmillan coursebooks (intermediate and upper-intermediate level). The experimental results suggest that AI tools can be effectively used for generating grammar and vocabulary drills and phonetic exercises, for making glossaries, multiple choice tests, scenarios for communicative situations, as well as creating text materials and translation exercises. However, when it comes to generating freer practice activities aimed at developing students’ critical thinking and fostering spontaneous classroom communication, the limitations of using AI tools become markedly apparent.

References

  1. Al-khresheh M. H. Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching // Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2024. Vol. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100218
  2. Bahçeci F., Gürol M. The effect of individualized instruction system on the academic achievement scores of students // Education Research International. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7392125
  3. Firat M. How Chat GPT Can Transform Autodidactic Experiences and Open Education? // OSF Preprints. 2023. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/9ge8m
  4. Govindarajan R., Christuraj G. Opportunities and challenges of using ChatGPT in the ELT scenario of Utas, Nizwa, Oman // The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes. 2023. Vol. 11. Iss. 3. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP230529046G
  5. Korenev A. A. Strategies of using artificial intelligence for written corrective feedback in language education // Lomonosov Linguistics and Intercultural Communication Journal. 2024. Vol. 27. №. 2.
  6. Kasneci E., Seßler K., Küchemann S., Bannert M., Dementieva D., Fischer F., Gasser U., Groh G., Günnemann S., Hüllermeier E., et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education // OSF Preprints. 2023. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/5er8f
  7. Kostikova I., Holubnycha L., Besarab T., Moshynska O., Moroz T., Shamaieva I. Chat GPT for Professional English Course Development // International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2024. Vol.18. Iss. 2 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i02.46623
  8. Kostka I., Toncelli R. Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations // TESL-EJ. 2023. Vol. 27. Iss. 3. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int
  9. Lund B. D., Wang T. Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? // Library Hi Tech News. 2023. Vol. 40. Iss. 3. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
  10. Mikolajczyk T., Moldovan L., Chalupczak A., Moldovan F.Computer Aided Learning Process // Procedia Engineering. 2017. Vol. 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.503
  11. Mitkov R., An Ha L., Karamanis N. A computer-aided environment for generating multiple-choice test items // Natural Language Engineering. 2006. Vol. 12. Iss. 2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324906004177
  12. Perez-Beltrachini L., Gardent C., Kruszewski G. Generating grammar exercises // The 7th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, NAACL-HLT Workshop. 2012.
  13. Poole F. J. Using ChatGPT to Design Language Material and Exercises // OSF Preprints. 2023. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/cqnbg
  14. Scrivener J. Learning Teaching. The Essential Guide to English Language Teaching. Macmillan Education, Oxford, 2011.
  15. Shemshack A., Spector J. M. A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms // Smart Learning Environments. 2020. Vol. 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00140-9[1]
  16. Souza W. I., Pereira Á. R. Jr. A Methodology for Automatic Generation of Vocabulary Exercises // Proceedings of the 23rd Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia ‘17)., ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126858.3131566
  17. Titova S. V. The Map of Competencies of a Foreign Language University Teacher in the Context of Digitalization of Education // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2022. Vol. 31. № 5. doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-5-133-149
  18. Tuba L., Süheyla A. The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT // Heliyon. 2023. Vol. 9. Iss. 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688

Author information

Tatiana Gennadievna Evtushenko

PhD, Associate Professor

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

Ekaterina Vladimirovna Shostak

PhD

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

Anzhelika Vitalievna Drobchik

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

About this article

Publication history

  • Received: May 6, 2025.
  • Published: June 6, 2025.

Keywords

  • преподавание английского языка как иностранного
  • технологии искусственного интеллекта
  • дидактические материалы для изучения иностранного языка
  • разработка учебных материалов
  • большие языковые модели
  • English language teaching
  • generative artificial intelligence
  • language learning materials
  • content creation in education
  • large language models

Copyright

© 2025 The Author(s)
© 2025 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)